31-year-old Kurd sentenced for assault dakin of 11-year-old Swedish dakin boy
News All the chronicles of Jack London Best results Concerned Nässjöbos dakin all articles and chronicles Today's Nuheters all headlines Dom B 2354-11 A very "lazy dog" to simplify botaniseringen on Exposed Flyer Printing Comment Policy Contact lazybones to write articles Loognas entire friends list About Exposed Home Question of the Week and results We tip
The 31-year-old Kurd Sabah Al-Adi, a resident of Skåne Ödåkra, went to primary school Glade School dakin and dealt a blow with the open hand in the face of a Swedish boy. Al-Adi dakin said during the trial that the motive for the assault was that the Swedish boy would "have fought" with his son.
The lawsuit did not state prosecutor Hans Harding which citizenship Kurd has. However, it appeared that Al-Adi has an interpreter needs to badinani, which is a northern Kurdish dialect that has elements of Arabic words and expressions.
The perpetrators: Sabah Al-Adi has 5 November 2013 at Glade School of Merkuriusgatan dakin in Ödåkra in Helsingborg municipality assaulted the victim by hitting him once in the face. By beating the plaintiff caused pain and redness. The assault is not to judge who to call. Al-Adi committed the offense with intent.
The question here is whether Al-Adis information that he just took a while for the chin and did not intend to harm the plaintiff is refuted. The valuation of the three hearing children's information must be considered that they were not heard before the court and, therefore, not been possible to ask them questions at the hearing. dakin
The plaintiff has in the police interview provided information that Al-Adi hit him in the face and he ran out of battle and that it was a blush on the cheek. In the assessment of the plaintiff's data can be stated that in his police interrogation has not wanted to admit that he and Al-Adi's son Shukur had fought without giving liked to give the impression that he is not never done anything against Shukur.
His tasks in this section is contradicted by witness one indication that they used to fight with each other. Furthermore, the plaintiff stated in the police interview spontaneous pain set in four to five hours but verification questions about how it felt later, he stated that the pain was sitting in the evening, overnight and up to two days.
Aggrieved party data may be in the parts that are essential to the prosecution strongly supported by witness and one witness 2. The three children in police interrogations provided the following consistency of data. Al-Adi came to the plaintiff and said something to the effect that the plaintiff dakin does not have to beat Shukur, and then handed a blow to the plaintiff's cheek with an open hand. On the cheek synthesis then a blush. They have proved the battle as a blow with an open hand.
Witness 1 and Witness 2 has the interrogation told relatively freely and independently provided detailed dakin information on the course of events. dakin Their tasks are, as stated, dakin in essence, been consistent but differed in some details.
For example, it seemed that, to some extent dakin submitted different dakin versions of their relative positioning on the spot, the battle immediate effect on the victim and where the different persons took the road after the incident in the schoolyard. That the data differ dakin slightly does not affect the impression that they understood the situation where the battle was distributed in the same way.
That their data to some extent differ also suggest that they are not trained in any common history. Nor has emerged to suggest that any of them would have no vested interest misrepresent Al-Adi struck the victim in the face. It has not revealed any factor which suggests that they were mistaken in that it was a blow that was awarded to her cheek. The probative value of the witnesses data may be considered to be high.
Furthermore, the children's information supported by the school mentor AE and her tasks. She noted that the plaintiff was not feeling well and when she been told about the battle, saw a blush on the cheek. On the opposite cheek was no similar symbol. She tried to document the redness by photographing it. She further attended the involved children talk with the school counselor.
She noted in particular that the children were very consistent about Al-Adi gone back and struck the victim in the face. She does not remember that it is then submitted no information on any tag on the chin. Place of the victim's mother stated that the plaintiff for her told us that Al-Adi taken a hold of her head and turning.
However, it has to some extent been unclear about her perception of the event based solely on plaintiff's duties to her, or even data from the principal, mentor and Al Adi. The data speaks to some extent so well for the plaintiff or Al-Adis data. Her duties does not preclude a kind, as the witnesses who attended the event perceived, has been awarded.
The district court considers overall that the plaintiff data may be so
News All the chronicles of Jack London Best results Concerned Nässjöbos dakin all articles and chronicles Today's Nuheters all headlines Dom B 2354-11 A very "lazy dog" to simplify botaniseringen on Exposed Flyer Printing Comment Policy Contact lazybones to write articles Loognas entire friends list About Exposed Home Question of the Week and results We tip
The 31-year-old Kurd Sabah Al-Adi, a resident of Skåne Ödåkra, went to primary school Glade School dakin and dealt a blow with the open hand in the face of a Swedish boy. Al-Adi dakin said during the trial that the motive for the assault was that the Swedish boy would "have fought" with his son.
The lawsuit did not state prosecutor Hans Harding which citizenship Kurd has. However, it appeared that Al-Adi has an interpreter needs to badinani, which is a northern Kurdish dialect that has elements of Arabic words and expressions.
The perpetrators: Sabah Al-Adi has 5 November 2013 at Glade School of Merkuriusgatan dakin in Ödåkra in Helsingborg municipality assaulted the victim by hitting him once in the face. By beating the plaintiff caused pain and redness. The assault is not to judge who to call. Al-Adi committed the offense with intent.
The question here is whether Al-Adis information that he just took a while for the chin and did not intend to harm the plaintiff is refuted. The valuation of the three hearing children's information must be considered that they were not heard before the court and, therefore, not been possible to ask them questions at the hearing. dakin
The plaintiff has in the police interview provided information that Al-Adi hit him in the face and he ran out of battle and that it was a blush on the cheek. In the assessment of the plaintiff's data can be stated that in his police interrogation has not wanted to admit that he and Al-Adi's son Shukur had fought without giving liked to give the impression that he is not never done anything against Shukur.
His tasks in this section is contradicted by witness one indication that they used to fight with each other. Furthermore, the plaintiff stated in the police interview spontaneous pain set in four to five hours but verification questions about how it felt later, he stated that the pain was sitting in the evening, overnight and up to two days.
Aggrieved party data may be in the parts that are essential to the prosecution strongly supported by witness and one witness 2. The three children in police interrogations provided the following consistency of data. Al-Adi came to the plaintiff and said something to the effect that the plaintiff dakin does not have to beat Shukur, and then handed a blow to the plaintiff's cheek with an open hand. On the cheek synthesis then a blush. They have proved the battle as a blow with an open hand.
Witness 1 and Witness 2 has the interrogation told relatively freely and independently provided detailed dakin information on the course of events. dakin Their tasks are, as stated, dakin in essence, been consistent but differed in some details.
For example, it seemed that, to some extent dakin submitted different dakin versions of their relative positioning on the spot, the battle immediate effect on the victim and where the different persons took the road after the incident in the schoolyard. That the data differ dakin slightly does not affect the impression that they understood the situation where the battle was distributed in the same way.
That their data to some extent differ also suggest that they are not trained in any common history. Nor has emerged to suggest that any of them would have no vested interest misrepresent Al-Adi struck the victim in the face. It has not revealed any factor which suggests that they were mistaken in that it was a blow that was awarded to her cheek. The probative value of the witnesses data may be considered to be high.
Furthermore, the children's information supported by the school mentor AE and her tasks. She noted that the plaintiff was not feeling well and when she been told about the battle, saw a blush on the cheek. On the opposite cheek was no similar symbol. She tried to document the redness by photographing it. She further attended the involved children talk with the school counselor.
She noted in particular that the children were very consistent about Al-Adi gone back and struck the victim in the face. She does not remember that it is then submitted no information on any tag on the chin. Place of the victim's mother stated that the plaintiff for her told us that Al-Adi taken a hold of her head and turning.
However, it has to some extent been unclear about her perception of the event based solely on plaintiff's duties to her, or even data from the principal, mentor and Al Adi. The data speaks to some extent so well for the plaintiff or Al-Adis data. Her duties does not preclude a kind, as the witnesses who attended the event perceived, has been awarded.
The district court considers overall that the plaintiff data may be so
No comments:
Post a Comment